
Plants
and their acoustic benefits
Trees
and shrubs have been used for many years to reduce traffic
noise from busy roads. Research now shows that plants
can also help to reduce background noise levels inside
buildings. Some plant species are more effective than
others and the benefits are most pronounced in buildings
with hard, reflective surfaces.
Research
Tests
carried out in the early 1990s by Rentokil Initial’s
Research and Development Department suggested that interior
plants can absorb, diffract or reflect background noise
in buildings, thereby making the environment more comfortable
for the occupants. The effect appears to be dependent
on plant type, planting density, location and sound
frequency.
To
investigate the potential acoustic benefits of interior
plants in more detail, further research was carried
out by a post-graduate student, Peter Costa, at South
Bank University, London. Rentokil supported this work
by providing access to computer data, technical advice,
plant specimens and test sites.
To
quantify the acoustic effect, the sound absorption coefficients
of a number of plant species were measured and compared
with other building materials (see table).
| Table
of Absorption Coefficients |
|
|
Sound
Frequency (Hz) |
| 125 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
2000 |
4000 |
| Ficus
benjamina |
0.06
|
0.06 |
0.10 |
0.19 |
0.22 |
0.57 |
| Howea
forsteriana |
0.21 |
0.11 |
0.09 |
0.22 |
0.11 |
0.08 |
| Dracaena
fragrans |
0.13 |
0.14 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.16 |
0.11 |
| Spathiphyllum
wallisii |
0.09
|
0.07 |
0.08 |
0.13 |
0.22 |
0.44 |
| Dracaena
marginata |
0.13 |
0.03 |
0.16 |
0.08 |
0.14 |
0.47 |
| Schefflera
arboricola |
-
|
0.13 |
0.06 |
0.22 |
0.23 |
0.47 |
| Philodendron
scandens |
-
|
0.23 |
0.22 |
0.29 |
0.34 |
0.72 |
|
Comparisons |
| Bark
mulch |
0.05
|
0.16 |
0.26 |
0.46 |
0.73 |
0.88 |
| Thick
pile carpet |
0.15 |
0.25 |
0.50 |
0.60 |
0.70 |
0.70 |
| Plasterboard |
0.30 |
0.15 |
0.10 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
| |
0.45
|
0.75 |
0.90 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
0.95 |
The
higher the absorption coefficient, the better the material
is at absorbing sound – a coefficient of 0.25
means that a quarter of the sound is absorbed, 0.50
half the sound and so on.
The
study indicates that plants are generally more efficient
at absorbing high sound frequencies than low. Good examples
of this are Spathiphyllum wallisii (Peace Lily),
Philodendron scandens (Sweetheart Plant), Dracaena
marginata (Madagascan Dragon Tree) and Ficus
benjamina (Weeping Fig).
High
frequencies cause the most irritation to building occupants
so the benefit of having plants becomes clear.
How do plants
help?
Plants
absorb, diffract and reflect sound. The balance varies
with the frequency at which the sound is generated and
the room's physical properties. The type of plant, its
size, shape, the container, top dressings and the compost
all have an effect on the sound reduction capabilities
of plant displays.
Absorption
Plants alter room acoustics by reducing the reverberation
time. Plants work better in acoustically live
spaces, such as those that have hard surfaces
like marble walls, exposed concrete and stone floors.
The impact of plants is less likely to be noticeable
in an acoustically quiet space, containing soft furnishings,
carpets, heavy curtains or well upholstered chairs,
which have a much greater capacity to absorb sound.
 |
Acoustically
live space |
| |
 |
Acoustically
quiet space |
Diffraction
and Reflection
At lower frequencies plants may diffract and reflect
sound. This is because the leaf size is small
by comparison to the noise wavelength. Plants
with lots of small leaves are useful as they scatter
and diffuse sound. At higher frequencies the leaves
may reflect sound towards other surfaces that may then
absorb the noise.
How to use
plants to reduce noise
The
principles that apply to the placement of noise reducing
furnishings can also be applied to the use of plants.
Large
plant containers
Bigger plant containers contain more compost and have
a greater area of top dressing. Both of these
have a significant effect on noise reduction, so it
follows that they make a larger impact on the room acoustics.
Experiments have shown that arrangements of different
plants in groups appear to work better than individual
plants.
Several
small arrangements are better than one big one
Positioning several arrangements around a space works
better than concentrating the plants in one location.
In this way the surface area of the plants exposed to
noise may be maximized and individual work areas in
an office space will all benefit from a localized effect.
Edges
and corners are better than the centre
Plants placed near the edges and corners of a space
are better than plants in the middle. This is because
sound is reflected from the walls straight into the
foliage.
Consider
using screen plants instead of office partitions
Open-plan
offices are often very noisy places. The hum of
computers, the ringing of telephones and the buzz of
conversation all make for a surprisingly noisy environment.
Often these spaces are divided up with partitions or
ranks of filing cabinets. Plant screens are an effective
alternative. The tops of filing cabinets can also
be used to place plants. Small bushy plants in
narrow troughs take up little space, but they can still
be effective.
Author:
Kenneth
Freeman
Additional
material: Peter Costa, Mike Lothian
Copyright
2003 Rentokil Initial plc
Sources
of further information: Costa, P. and James, R.W. (1995)
Environmental engineering benefits of plants.
Proceedings of the Workplace Comfort Forum, London,
UK.
|